It might seem like stating the obvious but a review is, for the most part, an entirely subjective thing. When you read a review - be it of a new phone, an online service, or a piece of software - you're reading an opinion. The manufacturer of said software may not like such statements, but that does not make it defamatory. It is also not defamatory to point out that a piece of antimalware software appears to throw up a number of false positives. There is a very big difference between saying 'this software will break your computer without question', and pointing out that "some users are not aware that when purchasing SpyHunter, they have agreed to a subscription service with an automatic renewal policy". The idea of defamation is one that is very easily dismissed or accepted. While there are lots of complaints about the title from users, primarily concerning what people deem to be 'deceptive pricing' (SpyHunter is promoted as being free, when in reality it is not) - something Enigma Software regards as defamatory. The offending forum post dates back to 2014, and it compares SpyHunter with Malwarebytes and IObit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |